According to Dan Kennedy, Ms. Obama went on a mentoring of young-girls style blitz across D.C., and brought along a number of “representatives” to show the girls that she met that they can be anything that they want to be when they grow up.
If all the national and local D.C. media coverage of this I saw and read is accurate, Michelle, judging by the stars she presented as role models, wants the young women to aspire to be singers and actresses, athletes, 4-star generals and astronauts. There was only one woman CEO or entrepreneur mentioned by media – Debra Lee, the CEO of the Black Entertainment Network; no women small business owners, no top women sales professionals – not even difference-makers like school teachers or nurses and caregivers or stay-at-home moms raising successful families.
Or even political leaders, like, say the successful governor of a fiscally stable state. Like, say, Governor Sarah Palin. She was one of only two women ever to run for vice-president on either of the two major parties’ tickets, and a mom. And unlike, say, Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, she hasn’t run her state into the ground.
No, Michelle presented Alicia Keyes and Sheryl Crow, actresses Fran Drescher and Phylicia Rashad; a couple of athletes; the first black woman to travel in space; and a celebrity make-up artist.
What is so significant here is that nearly all the examples-to-aspire-to presented are primarily supported by the economy; not supporters of the economy. Not creators of innovative products, of companies, of jobs. Not women who started some sort of enterprises from scratch and built them into successful businesses. Heaven forbid we should encourage these girls to grow up to be business owners. Better for them to hope for a spin of the wheel of celebrity via American Idol. Particularly appropriate given our celebrity-president.
Now, a few (minor) issues with Mr. Kennedy’s statements: First, he wasn’t there, so he doesn’t know for sure that more productive women weren’t included who just somehow escaped media attention (far-fetched, I’m sure); second, I’m not sure that “the first black woman in space” is that minor a role- becoming an astronaut is pretty impressive; I would assume that she is a scientist, so hopefully she’s contributing something in terms of research.
But the boat that I think Kennedy misses is that this is not a problem with the Obamas, not by a long shot. This is a problem with the whole women’s power movement in general. Women are so used to being told how fantastic they are and how much they can accomplish that they a) think that it’s perfectly rational that they should become famous actresses/singers/athletes; and b) that the world owes it to them to make it so.
The result: so many gals out there never put any thought into what they produce and what they offer- it’s all what I want, what the world should give me, and what fulfills me- never are they to consider finding a need and fulfilling it.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »
Amazing lack of reading comphrehension
Tennessee has a bill up for hearing that would allow professors to carry guns on campus. Here’s what the second paragraph of the article says:
Got that? “full time faculty and staff member with a valid permit.” Not really a difficult concept, not complicated with legalese, pretty simple use of words.
So, for whatever self-hating masochistic reasons, I have to go and read the comments. Lets have a look-see, shall we?
(emphasis mine) That’s out of 36 comments (and there are several others that seriously imply, but don’t specifically state, that they understood it to apply to college students (who are not, for the record, kids, particularly if they have carry permits, which are issued over age 21)). My favorite, by the way, is the last one, where not only does the proposal to allow professors with carry permits actually apply to students, but it also applies to students who are living on campus away from their parents for the very first time (most of whom would be 18, obviously), and it would involve giving guns to all of the college students guns.
Anyhow, I support the measure, but doubt it would do a lick of good, given that maybe2 professors on campus would actually make use of it. But hey, if some nut-job comes in blazing, I’d sure hope that I was in one of those professors’ classrooms.
By the way, I had the opportunity to meet Stacey Campfield (the proponent of this bill) when he graciously came to speak at an event sponsored by our Federalist Society. I was really impressed with his willingness to discuss and debate his ideas, and he was more than happy to invite tough questions from the students. He is known for being a bit on the extra-conservative side, so a few of the more liberal students discussed staging a protest. Notice that I say discussed; they didn’t actually do it, nor did they even bother to show up to ask him questions or see what he had to say.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: (Not so) Higher Education, Guns, Reading the Comments, Stacey Campfield | Leave a comment »